Container Type | Energy Per Ton Wasted (MBtu) (a) | Containers Wasted, 2005 (b) | Energy Wasted Due to "Replacement Production" (c) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Units (billion) | Tons (million) | Barrels of Crude Oil Equivalent (million) | Households' Total Annual Energy Needs Met (million) | ||
Aluminum cans | 206.9 | 55.0 | 0.8 | 29.0 | 1.5 |
#1 PET plastic bottles | 53.4 | 43.6 | 1.5 | 14.3 | 0.3 |
#2 HDPE plastic bottles | 51.4 | 6.8 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 0.1 |
Glass bottles | 2.7 | 28.8 | 6.9 | 3.2 | 0.1 |
Total | n/a | 134.1 | 9.6 | 50.2 | 2.0 |
(a) Million British Thermal Units (MBtu) per ton of "replacement" containers; ie., the difference in energy required to make 1 ton of containers from 100% virgin materials vs. 100% recycled materials. Source for per ton energy requirements: "Waste Management and Energy Savings: Benefits by the Numbers." Choate, Ferland et. al., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, October 2005. (b) Aluminum can data based on data from the Aluminum Association and the U.S. Department of Commerce; plastic and glass data is estimated using data from prior years from the Glass Packaging Institute, the U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste, the American Plastics Council, and the National Association of PET Container Resources. (c) Factors used: 5.78 MBtu/barrel crude oil; Avg. annual residential energy use: 94.6 Mbtu/household. Source: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “A Look at Residential Energy Consumption in 2001.” www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/consumption. © Container Recycling Institute, 2006 |
Americans waste (landfill, litter, and incinerate) about 425 beverage containers per capita per year--twice as many as we recycle.
Environmental impacts of this wasting include:
When beverage containers are wasted, they must be replaced with new bottles and cans made from virgin materials. Production using virgin (primary) materials is more energy-intensive than production using recycled (secondary) feedstock, and it generates more pollutants of all kinds: airborne emissions, toxic liquid effluents, and solid wastes from mining and industrial processing, for example.
The environmental effects of this “replacement production” are particularly pronounced for aluminum cans (See CRI's Trashed Cans report). Primary aluminum production entails strip mining bauxite ore, refining it into alumina using fuel oil and other chemical inputs, transporting it vast distances, and smelting it into aluminum ingot using large quantities of electricity. New hydroelectric dams are often built to produce electricity for aluminum smelters, damaging river ecosystems and displacing indigenous peoples in many regions of the world.
The manufacturing processes for PET and HDPE plastic bottles are not as environmentally egregious as aluminum can production, but they are still energy consumptive and polluting, relying on natural gas and petroleum derivatives. To read more about the effects of making plastics, click here.
Taken together, the energy used to replace the 134 billion beverage containers wasted in 2005 was equivalent to 50 million barrels of crude oil. This is enough to supply the total residential energy needs of about 2 million American households for a year.
Click here to see a table of energy impacts by material in 2005.
An estimated 11.6 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions were also produced in the process of replacing the 153 billion bottles and cans not recycled in 2010, as the table shows.
While the aluminum industry has come a long way in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the smelting process itself, the worldwide quantity of aluminum-related greenhouse gases has continued to rise. This is due in large part to the greenhouse gas impacts of increased total aluminum demand, and thus increased electricity generation--from coal, natural gas, and hydroelectric dams.
Toxics are also released into the soil and water when bauxite or is mined and processed for refining into alumina. For every ton of aluminum produced, about 5 tons of caustic red mud wastes are produced, along with a host of other pollutants , including NOx and SOx (contributors to acid rain and smog), toxic fluorides and volatile hydrocarbons, and other industrial effluents.
Beverage containers typically comprise 40% to 60% of roadside litter in non-deposit states. In a 1999 statewide study, the Solid Waste Coordinators of Kentucky found that beverage containers and closures made up 52% of roadside litter, as the below figure shows. The same study found that beverage container material made up 42% of litter in state waterways, and an average of 49% of litter at all sites. The Virginia Shenandoah Valley Audubon Society, a participant in the state’s Adopt-a-Highway program, carefully recorded the litter they picked up several times a year from 1990 to 1998. They found that beverage containers accounted for 69% of litter collected on their adopted highways over the 9-year period.
Beverage container litter can be dangerous to people and animals.
People stepping on broken glass beer bottles can sustain deep cuts. Soon after Massachusetts enacted its deposit law in 1983, doctors at Children’s Hospital in Boston found a 60% decrease in glass-related lacerations that required stitches. [1]
Livestock can be maimed or even killed by beverage container litter, either by stepping on broken cans and glass bottles, or by ingesting sharp pieces of containers that end up in their feed. This happens when a farm combine working along a roadside inadvertently “harvests” littered bottles and cans that have been tossed out of car windows.
Wildlife are also susceptible to broken glass injuries, and marine birds in particular are prone to mistake littered plastic bottle caps as food. Unable to digest or excrete them, the birds gradually starve to death.
1. Douglas M. Baker, MK; Sally E. Moore; and Paul H. Wise, MD, PhD, MPH. “The Impact of ‘Bottle Bill’ Legislation on the Incidence of Lacerations in Childhood,” American Journal of Public Health, October 1986.
Click on an organization name on the map below to visit their website.
Or, scroll down for an alphabetized list.
Zero Waste Alliance
Zero Waste International Alliance
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
Zero Emissions Research and Initiatives
Grassroots Recycling Network and their GreenYes! mailing list
Eliminating beverage container waste won’t be easy. Without concrete recycling goals and a plan for attaining them, beverage consumption is doomed to continue on its present course, a course that is not sustainable in the long term.
There are a wide variety of steps individuals, organizations and institutions can take to bring us closer to Zero Beverage Container Waste. We’ve taken a stab at A though H (and Z of course!); we hope you’ll pitch in with ideas covering I through Y!
Alternatives to packaged beverages. Daily consumption of packaged beverages has become the norm for the average American… (continued)
Bottled water alternatives. Bottled water consumption has grown more sharply than any other beverage type. Between 1976 and 1996, U.S. bottled water consumption increased 10-fold… (continued)
Curbside improvement. During the 1990s, curbside recycling in the United States mushroomed from about 2,000 programs serving only 15% of the population to 10,000 programs serving about half of the American population… (continued)
Deposit/Return systems place a small, fully refundable deposit (a nickel or a dime) on beverage bottles and cans… (continued)
Education: spread the word about container recycling and reuse… (continued)
Food-venue recycling. At least a third of all packaged beverage consumption takes place outside the home… (continued)
Goal-setting by the beverage industry. We call on the U.S. beverage and packaging industries to join us in adopting these incremental Zero Beverage Container Waste goals… (continued)
Help bring back refillables: Refillable glass beverage bottles have been phased out in the United States, with small exceptions… (continued)
Zero is the goal: If we continue on our current path, remaining content with modest recycling goals of 25% or 30% or even 50%, we will continue to waste energy and resources, pollute the air and water in other parts of the world where raw materials are extracted and processed, and foul our own communities. If we can envision and work towards a waste-free society, we will take a giant step towards a sustainable society. We must articulate this vision to our public and elected officials at the local, state and federal levels, to the corporations that manufacture and distribute the beverages we enjoy, to our friends, family, and neighbors. And each of us needs to live our vision of Zero Beverage Container Waste—every day, by reusing and recycling their beverage cans and bottles and reusing them when possible.
New beverage container deposit program bills. Expansion and repeal proposals. Sales, redemption rate and waste trends. Refillable bottle infrastructure. Extended producer responsibility.
CRI covers them all – and more – as the leading source of original research, objective analysis and responsible advocacy on the recycling of beverage containers.
Get the latest insights on our Publications and Letters and Briefings pages. Also visit our California DRS page for details on important upgrades made to the state’s beverage container deposit return program, but also the need for additional program reforms – in large part due to misreporting of its fund balance, which diligent work by CRI helped bring to light.
Plus, sign up for our Weekly Headlines e-newsletter for the latest beverage container deposit and recycling industry news, and check back for new information as we continue working to make North America a global model for the collection and quality recycling of packaging materials.
CRI offers a variety of membership and partnership options that provide a wide range of benefits, including complimentary registration to CRI webinars, technical assistance and more.
Review the options on our Memberships & Partnerships page and join us!
Find a wealth of data on metrics such as recycling rates, waste and sales for all beverage container types on CRI’s Data Archive page. Charts and graphs present key information in a user-friendly way.