Has this website been useful?

We depend on your support to keep it running!
Find out how you can help us today.


Glass Containers


The recovery rate for glass containers has shown minimal growth over the past four years, increasing from 29 percent in 1994 to just 31 percent in 1997. But, because glass container production has declined, the number of tons of cullet (crushed glass) recycled actually dropped from 3.14 million tons in 1994 to 2.92 million tons in 1997.

Of greater concern is the fact that fewer tons of color-sorted glass was available to make new glass bottles and jars. This is due in part to the trend towards commingled curbside collection of recyclables. When materials are collected 'commingled' (not separated) they become contaminated, thus lowering the value of the materials.

The impact of contamination can be seen in the newly released numbers for 1997, showing that cullet purchases for making new glass containers was the lowest it's been in six years.

According to the European Glass Federation, glass recycling in Europe hit record levels in 1996. When measured against the high glass container recycling rates in sixteen European countries, the

U.S. was in fifteenth place. The bar graph below compares the U.S. rate to nine of the sixteen countries surveyed.

Five countries had rates that were more than twice as high as the U.S. and two had rates that were almost twice as high. Only Turkey and the United Kingdom had rates lower than the` U.S. rate of 33 percent. Switzerland had the highest rate at 89 percent.

Countries with glass recycling rates above 70 percent have some form of 'producer responsibility' regulation in place.

 

Graph: compares recycling rates of various countries. The only country with a worse rate on this graph for recycling in the UK. Source: Glass Gazzette